AMT Recovery Strategies, and the Moves That Backfire Seven levers that open the gap between regular tax and AMT, four moves that make it worse, and what to do when time runs out
Income that is taxed more heavily under regular tax than under AMT, created without raising the client’s overall tax. Salary, pension, RRIF and interest work best. Eligible dividends and capital gains work poorly.
Flat federal AMT rate.
Most plans combine two or more.
They lower AMT by raising regular tax.
What every AMT recovery strategy has to do
A strategy works only if it brings AMT below regular federal tax, without unduly raising regular tax, and without pushing AMT into the following year.
The quickest way to see which levers work is to line up federal rates by income type against the flat 20.5% AMT rate. Income taxed below that line tends to create AMT. Income taxed above it creates room to recover.
Approximate top federal rates by income type. Provincial tax applies in addition.
Need the mechanism first? How AMT recovery works explains the carryforward formula.
Seven AMT recovery strategies
Most successful plans combine two or more of these. All of them are fact specific and need to be modelled on the client’s projected income before acting.
Multiply the AMT exemption
Every individual has their own exemption. Arranging income across a household changes how much of each exemption is used, and the obvious split is not always the best one.
Best fit: Couples with a carryforward on one side
Shift the income mix
Move toward income that is taxed more heavily under regular tax than AMT. Salary, pension, RRIF and interest income recover AMT far better than eligible dividends.
Best fit: Owner-managers and clients with flexible compensation
Realize gains in a corporation
Corporations are not subject to AMT. Holding a growth portfolio in a holding company can stop AMT recurring for clients with large or regular gains.
Best fit: Single investors with large recurring gains
Lend to a spouse at the prescribed rate
A properly structured loan moves investment income to a spouse without attribution, giving the AMT-paying spouse regular income to recover against.
Best fit: Households with a high-income spouse
Match gains and losses in the same year
Loss carryovers are treated harshly under AMT. Realizing gains and losses in the same year avoids it, and 2026 offers a one-time carryback to pre-2024 gain years.
Best fit: Clients with unrealized losses in the portfolio
Move other tax attributes
Donations, medical expenses and pension income splitting can sometimes be shifted between spouses to absorb AMT or create recovery room.
Best fit: Couples both in the top bracket
Plan the final return
There is no AMT in the year of death. Choosing not to roll everything over can create regular tax that absorbs the full carryforward.
Best fit: Clients with a carryforward and an estate plan
Not sure which applies?
Run the client through the AMT recovery checklist first.
Each lever is modelled with before-and-after figures, including when to combine them, in AMT Recovery Mission.
Four moves that backfire
Each of these lowers AMT on paper. In practice they raise regular tax or cost more than the AMT they save.
Claiming smaller losses or deductions
Under-claiming a net capital loss or interest expense lowers AMT by raising regular tax. The client pays more overall.
Skipping or unwinding RRSPs
Skipping the RRSP deduction or withdrawing early raises regular tax and gives up tax-free compounding.
Changing the investment mix
Moving from growth to interest-bearing investments to avoid capital gains can cost more economically than the AMT saved.
Refusing to sell
Holding a position purely to avoid AMT lets tax drive the investment decision, which is rarely the right trade.
When a carryforward is about to expire
With no carryback and a seven-year limit, an expiring carryforward sometimes justifies creating income just to absorb it. Not all income is equal for this:
| Income created | Effect on recovery |
|---|---|
| Salary, RRSP or RRIF withdrawals | Best |
| Ineligible dividends | Workable |
| Eligible dividends | Poor |
| Donations | An alternative to test |
| Capital gains | Usually a losing strategy |
What is the net cost? Compare the extra tax on the income created against the AMT recovered. It can be worth it, and it can be expensive, so model it before acting.
AMT recovery strategy questions
What is the best way to recover AMT?
Generate income that is taxed more heavily under regular tax than under AMT, without raising overall tax. Regular income such as salary, pension, RRIF and interest recovers AMT most efficiently; eligible dividends recover it poorly.
Can income splitting help recover AMT?
Yes. Each individual has their own AMT exemption, so arranging income across a household can multiply the exemption. In some cases the best result comes from deliberately not splitting certain income.
Should capital gains be realized in a holding company to avoid AMT?
Corporations are not subject to AMT, so for clients with large or recurring gains, holding investments in a corporation can stop AMT recurring. It changes the overall tax cost and needs to be modelled.
What should you do if an AMT carryforward is about to expire?
Consider creating regular income to absorb it, such as salary, RRSP or RRIF withdrawals, but evaluate the net cost first. Capital gains are generally a poor way to absorb an expiring carryforward.
Which AMT recovery strategies backfire?
Claiming smaller loss or interest deductions, skipping RRSP deductions or making early RRSP withdrawals usually just raise regular tax. Changing an investment mix or refusing to sell purely for AMT reasons can cost more than it saves.
You know the levers. Choosing and sizing them is the hard part.
- How much recovery does each lever actually produce for a given client, in dollars?
- Which combinations work together, and which cancel each other out?
- When does a corporate structure or spousal loan cost more than the AMT it recovers?
- How do you plan around a trust, a departure, or a carryforward in its final year?
Free newsletter
Tax issues worth reading about.
Tax Trend keeps Canadian practitioners ahead of what matters: emerging CRA positions, technical planning issues, and the cases worth knowing about, written by the practitioners who teach our CPD programs.
- CRA positions and legislative updates at a practitioner level
- Written by senior Cadesky tax professionals
Cadesky Tax
Cadesky Tax Seminars provides specialized continuing professional development for CPAs and tax professionals across Canada. Founded by practicing CPAs from Cadesky and Associates LLP, we bring real-world experience to every program we deliver.